|
Post by suburbanplankton on Oct 15, 2012 16:38:53 GMT -5
It just occurred to me...we haven't heard anything about the Mercenary Today, have we? We could still wind up with someone 'stealing' the lynch based on Merc votes...right?
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Oct 15, 2012 16:57:24 GMT -5
I'll work on your Tracker post. The fact that you blocked Peeker means he didn't go anywhere theoretically so your saying he didn't go anywhere rings true. Meeko's case is total bullshit and many people agree. Be back with a rewrite in a bit.
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Oct 15, 2012 17:16:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Oct 15, 2012 17:17:15 GMT -5
I could take a stab at your PM, but I don't know how good I'd be at it... And on a related note, I think I'm going to have to vote for you, based on my "what I would do if I were Town" rule. I'm sorry about that, but I can't really justify my not voting for you in this situation. I'm pretty sure you're going to be lynched with or without my vote, so I'm going after you in hopes it will buy me a bit of town cred. Why would you have to vote her. It's Meeko for god's sakes! And he admits he's seen other people there.
|
|
|
Post by suburbanplankton on Oct 15, 2012 17:25:31 GMT -5
I could take a stab at your PM, but I don't know how good I'd be at it... And on a related note, I think I'm going to have to vote for you, based on my "what I would do if I were Town" rule. I'm sorry about that, but I can't really justify my not voting for you in this situation. I'm pretty sure you're going to be lynched with or without my vote, so I'm going after you in hopes it will buy me a bit of town cred. Why would you have to vote her. It's Meeko for god's sakes! And he admits he's seen other people there. It has nothing to do with Meeko in particular. It's the fact that she stalled so long in responding to his accusation, and when she did respond she's been giving out tidbits of information. Like I said, it's the way i would have voted if I were Town, so it's how I'm going to vote. It's the only way I know how to play as Scum. Having said that, if she comes back with a claim, and a plausible list of investigation targets, then that puts the pressure back on Meeko to cough up some more names, and we can quite possibly string up either him or Cookies Today. And on that note, who should lizzy claim to have tracked the other Nights?
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Oct 15, 2012 17:32:59 GMT -5
Well I wish she would have said she tracked peeks day one, but that's water under the bridge.
She can say she tracked Ginger on the night she decided not to do anything.
She can say on the other day/night she got busy and forgot. No matter what she should not implicate us I think. I'm a bit busy now so can't go back a recreate a path for her. Dizzy who in game did you call out and vote for? If we can be sure that person did nothing or died in the night you can claim that person as a possible trackee.
I'll try to put something together before I go off.
|
|
|
Post by suburbanplankton on Oct 15, 2012 17:35:30 GMT -5
To answer my own question about who Lizzy can claim to have tracked:
Night 2: pizza - he visited nobody
She voted him on Day 2, so he would be a natural target for him, and since she blocked him, we know it's true.
Night 3: Parzival - he visited BillMc
Pizza's case against him was apparently strong enough for the Vig/SK to target him, so there should be no problem believing that she found him suspicious as well.
Alternately, crys for Night 3, based on the fact that his claim is a bit wonky...to see if he kept his word and stayed in his room. Since he did, it's a safe claim...and if he didn't, he's hardly going to fess up to it now.
And in any and all cases, she got back a bunch of "visited nobody" results and/or her targets wound up dead, so there wasn't really anything worth reporting before now.
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Oct 15, 2012 20:39:16 GMT -5
Sorry I'm clueless here, and lying isn't my strong suit! I'm sorry I've failed big time here.
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Oct 15, 2012 20:52:45 GMT -5
What if I claim that I'm Third Party Non-Hostile and Recruitable? I think claiming town is a bit overplayed in this game where there's at most 5 townies left.
|
|
|
Post by silverjan on Oct 16, 2012 1:13:39 GMT -5
Damn, Meeko and his results.
|
|
|
Post by silverjan on Oct 16, 2012 1:30:49 GMT -5
I am going with a Town weak recruiter and I'm going to make a case against gnarly and say that I tried to visit him. Anyone want to make a fake PM for me?
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Oct 16, 2012 9:44:54 GMT -5
Well it looks like we are going to go down spectacularly in this game.
|
|
|
Post by suburbanplankton on Oct 16, 2012 9:53:37 GMT -5
Yeah, it's not looking too good for us right now, is it? Even if we were to somehow all survive Today, I think we've got too many people we need to eliminate, and too few of us to do it.
I've been working on adjusting my PM for the claim that I'll ultimately have to make. If you see any glaring mistakes, please let me know
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Oct 16, 2012 10:04:17 GMT -5
And I'm sorry, I haven't been paying attention, I forgot that silver jan was our killer that night and for sure would have been seen by meeko.
|
|
|
Post by silverjan on Oct 16, 2012 10:46:27 GMT -5
I wish you all the best for the game, have fun
|
|